Escopo de intake de caso
Organiza informações do cliente em briefs estruturados com stakeholders, limites de escopo, questões abertas e recomendações de próximos passos.
Official alternative
Anthropic maintains an official plugin workflow for this task. Use it when you want the full marketplace plugin with MCP connectors.
Litigation Matter Intake/plugin install litigation-legal@claude-for-legal
Official outputs require attorney review before client reliance.
Sobre esta skill
Organiza informações do cliente em briefs estruturados com stakeholders, limites de escopo, questões abertas e recomendações de próximos passos.
Skills provide structured workflow guidance for attorney-supervised use. They are not legal advice and require human review before client reliance.
How to install
- Download the ZIP and unzip the skill folder.
- In Claude: Settings → Capabilities → Skills → Upload skill folder.
- In Claude Code or Codex: copy the folder into `.claude/skills/` or `~/.agents/skills/`.
- Invoke the skill by describing a task that matches the skill description.
Skills provide structured workflow guidance for attorney-supervised use. They are not legal advice and require human review before client reliance.
Skill content preview
# Matter Intake Scoping Convert messy client inputs into a structured matter brief. ## Intake sources - Client emails, call notes, data room indexes, prior proposals - Business sponsor requests - Partial contracts or term sheets ## Workflow 1. **Matter snapshot** — type, urgency, parties, jurisdiction 2. **Objectives** — what success looks like for client and legal team 3. **Scope boundaries** — in scope / out of scope / assumptions 4. **Stakeholders** — client, legal, business, external counsel 5. **Risks and unknowns** 6. **Workplan** — phases, deliverables, dependencies 7. **Fee/proposal inputs** — complexity drivers (not pricing advice) ## Output format ```markdown ## Matter brief ## Background ## Objectives ## Scope (in / out / assumptions) ## Stakeholders ## Key documents received ## Open questions ## Proposed next steps ## Escalation triggers ``` ## Guardrails - Do not invent facts not provided by the user. - Flag conflicts, missing approvals, and regulatory triggers early. - Keep outputs internal unless user requests client-facing version.