Legal AI Skills
Find skills and plugins for legal research, contract review, and drafting. Choose a compatible tool, read the source and setup instructions, and test it on sample material before using it on a matter.
49
Catalog entries
12
Anthropic
3
OpenAI
8
Legalai.guide starters
How to choose and test a skill
- 01Choose an entry for your task and check which assistant it supports.
- 02Read the source, license and setup instructions; download or install only the package you have checked.
- 03Test with synthetic material. Compare the output with the source and record errors before use on a matter.
Community skills
Packages maintained by their linked authors, with source and license information. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Anthropic or OpenAI.
Before using a community package, check its source, license, required access and suitability for your jurisdiction. Test the output against the supplied material.
Find and Evaluate Community Legal Skills
Use this GitHub index to find a candidate for a defined legal task. Open the selected folder and read its SKILL.md, references, licence and required tools before adopting it. Authors and requirements differ across entries; inclusion is not evidence that a skill was executed or legally validated. Test with synthetic material, compare the result with its sources, and keep unsupported findings unresolved. Legalai.guide links to the collection; it does not maintain these downloads.
Evaluate the Community Contract Review Reference
The linked playbook-reviewer-anthropic folder contains an Anthropic-authored contract review reference in a community collection. Read its files and licence at the source. Before trying it, provide the full agreement, represented party and approved playbook; disable its fallback to generic commercial standards. Assess the clause-linked issue table against exact quotations, definitions and exceptions. Missing positions must remain unrated. This page is a source guide, not a Legalai.guide download or an executed review.
Evaluate the Community Privacy Review Reference
The privacy-compliance-advisor-anthropic folder is an Anthropic-authored reference hosted in the community collection. Use the source link to inspect its instructions and licence; compare them with the current official privacy plugin before choosing a version. Define the processing activity, parties, jurisdiction and source documents for a test. Require a source-linked list of privacy questions, not a blanket compliance verdict. Check applicability and missing facts with the privacy reviewer. This page does not provide or test a connected privacy service.
Evaluate the Community NDA Triage Reference
The nda-reviewer-anthropic copy uses GREEN/YELLOW/RED labels and predefined commercial positions. Inspect the full source and licence before a trial with a synthetic NDA, represented party and approved criteria. Its default durations and GREEN routing are not your organization's approval policy. Require exact clause evidence and leave missing criteria unresolved; a colour must not authorize signature. Compare the source with the current official NDA skill. No community package is maintained or tested by this page.
Review the Community Vendor Assessment Framework
Patrick Munro's linked vendor-due-diligence framework includes assessment inputs, report formats and a weighted score. Its scoring instructions conflict: the scale makes 5 critical, but the interpretation makes high totals low risk. Do not use those ratings for approval until the method is corrected and checked. You can inspect the evidence questions against an actual service scope and approved requirements. Verify document periods, exclusions and applicable jurisdiction. The source is external; Legalai.guide does not distribute a corrected version.
Evaluate the Community DPIA Reference
Oliver Schmidt-Prietz's dpia-sentinel folder includes GDPR screening instructions, jurisdiction references and assessment templates. Inspect the complete folder and licence, including any document-generation dependencies. For a trial, supply the processing description and relevant EU jurisdictions; check every cited criterion against current official guidance and authority lists. Missing facts must leave the screening decision open. The reference can structure a draft, but its presence does not establish a completed DPIA or permission to launch. Legalai.guide does not maintain the upstream files.
Evaluate the Community Legal Risk Matrix
Zacharie Laïk's legal-risk-assessment reference combines a severity-and-likelihood matrix with French and EU research instructions. It names GoodLegal tools; a source link does not supply access to them. Read the full files and licence, then test a documented issue against your approved risk definitions. Require actual authority passages and evidence for both dimensions. Do not present a ranking score as a measured probability, or treat the reference's percentages and age cutoffs as your policy. No research execution is verified here.
Evaluate the Community Document Review Table
Antoine Louis's tabular-review reference specifies a document folder, extraction columns and an Excel output. Its instructions expect PDF, DOCX and spreadsheet skills plus agent tools such as Task; those dependencies are not supplied by this page and may not exist in your assistant. Read the source files and licence before testing a small synthetic set. Check every source citation, missing document and output row against the manifest. A completed spreadsheet does not prove complete coverage. Legalai.guide does not maintain this external package.
Evaluate the French Whistleblowing Policy Reference
Malik Taiar's whistleblower-policy-advisor reference addresses French reporting systems in an EU context. Read the full folder, licence, legal references and supplied Word template before choosing its assessment or drafting mode. A trial needs the entity's status, existing procedure, channels, designated people and approved template. Check current French requirements and actual operating evidence; a policy draft does not prove a functioning system. Do not export its deadlines or thresholds to another jurisdiction. Legalai.guide links to the source and has not executed its workflow.
Evaluate the Community Mediation Preparation Reference
Jinzhe Tan's mediation-dispute-analysis reference structures party accounts, disputed issues and possible settlement options. Read its files, licence and optional Word-template requirements at the source. Supply authorized case materials, your role, the jurisdiction and confirmed negotiation authority for a trial. Distinguish each party's stated position from inferred interests, and check legal propositions against actual sources. Do not accept invented settlement ranges, predictions or confidentiality assurances. This is a guide to an external reference, not a tested mediation service or authority to make an offer.
Browse all
Commercial & Contracts
Evaluate the Community Contract Review Reference
The linked playbook-reviewer-anthropic folder contains an Anthropic-authored contract review reference in a community collection. Read its files and licence at the source. Before trying it, provide the full agreement, represented party and approved playbook; disable its fallback to generic commercial standards. Assess the clause-linked issue table against exact quotations, definitions and exceptions. Missing positions must remain unrated. This page is a source guide, not a Legalai.guide download or an executed review.
Evaluate the Community NDA Triage Reference
The nda-reviewer-anthropic copy uses GREEN/YELLOW/RED labels and predefined commercial positions. Inspect the full source and licence before a trial with a synthetic NDA, represented party and approved criteria. Its default durations and GREEN routing are not your organization's approval policy. Require exact clause evidence and leave missing criteria unresolved; a colour must not authorize signature. Compare the source with the current official NDA skill. No community package is maintained or tested by this page.
Compliance & Regulatory
Review the Community Vendor Assessment Framework
Patrick Munro's linked vendor-due-diligence framework includes assessment inputs, report formats and a weighted score. Its scoring instructions conflict: the scale makes 5 critical, but the interpretation makes high totals low risk. Do not use those ratings for approval until the method is corrected and checked. You can inspect the evidence questions against an actual service scope and approved requirements. Verify document periods, exclusions and applicable jurisdiction. The source is external; Legalai.guide does not distribute a corrected version.
Evaluate the Community Legal Risk Matrix
Zacharie Laïk's legal-risk-assessment reference combines a severity-and-likelihood matrix with French and EU research instructions. It names GoodLegal tools; a source link does not supply access to them. Read the full files and licence, then test a documented issue against your approved risk definitions. Require actual authority passages and evidence for both dimensions. Do not present a ranking score as a measured probability, or treat the reference's percentages and age cutoffs as your policy. No research execution is verified here.
Evaluate the French Whistleblowing Policy Reference
Malik Taiar's whistleblower-policy-advisor reference addresses French reporting systems in an EU context. Read the full folder, licence, legal references and supplied Word template before choosing its assessment or drafting mode. A trial needs the entity's status, existing procedure, channels, designated people and approved template. Check current French requirements and actual operating evidence; a policy draft does not prove a functioning system. Do not export its deadlines or thresholds to another jurisdiction. Legalai.guide links to the source and has not executed its workflow.
Data Protection & Privacy
Evaluate the Community Privacy Review Reference
The privacy-compliance-advisor-anthropic folder is an Anthropic-authored reference hosted in the community collection. Use the source link to inspect its instructions and licence; compare them with the current official privacy plugin before choosing a version. Define the processing activity, parties, jurisdiction and source documents for a test. Require a source-linked list of privacy questions, not a blanket compliance verdict. Check applicability and missing facts with the privacy reviewer. This page does not provide or test a connected privacy service.
Evaluate the Community DPIA Reference
Oliver Schmidt-Prietz's dpia-sentinel folder includes GDPR screening instructions, jurisdiction references and assessment templates. Inspect the complete folder and licence, including any document-generation dependencies. For a trial, supply the processing description and relevant EU jurisdictions; check every cited criterion against current official guidance and authority lists. Missing facts must leave the screening decision open. The reference can structure a draft, but its presence does not establish a completed DPIA or permission to launch. Legalai.guide does not maintain the upstream files.
Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Evaluate the Community Mediation Preparation Reference
Jinzhe Tan's mediation-dispute-analysis reference structures party accounts, disputed issues and possible settlement options. Read its files, licence and optional Word-template requirements at the source. Supply authorized case materials, your role, the jurisdiction and confirmed negotiation authority for a trial. Distinguish each party's stated position from inferred interests, and check legal propositions against actual sources. Do not accept invented settlement ranges, predictions or confidentiality assurances. This is a guide to an external reference, not a tested mediation service or authority to make an offer.
Legal Operations
Evaluate the Community Document Review Table
Antoine Louis's tabular-review reference specifies a document folder, extraction columns and an Excel output. Its instructions expect PDF, DOCX and spreadsheet skills plus agent tools such as Task; those dependencies are not supplied by this page and may not exist in your assistant. Read the source files and licence before testing a small synthetic set. Check every source citation, missing document and output row against the manifest. A completed spreadsheet does not prove complete coverage. Legalai.guide does not maintain this external package.
Skill Authoring
Find and Evaluate Community Legal Skills
Use this GitHub index to find a candidate for a defined legal task. Open the selected folder and read its SKILL.md, references, licence and required tools before adopting it. Authors and requirements differ across entries; inclusion is not evidence that a skill was executed or legally validated. Test with synthetic material, compare the result with its sources, and keep unsupported findings unresolved. Legalai.guide links to the collection; it does not maintain these downloads.
New to skills?
Subscribe to our newsletter
Legal AI news and practical tips, once a week.
Confirm by email; unsubscribe anytime · Beehiiv · Privacy policy.