Skip to main content
Intellectual Property & Patents

Patent Office Action Response

Analyze patent office actions and prepare strategic responses including rejection analysis, claim amendments, and interview preparation.

Time Saved

50-70% reduction in response preparation

Accuracy

Strategic analysis and drafting

Category

Intellectual Property & Patents

The Problem

  • Complex rejection analysis
  • Amendment strategy
  • Interview preparation
  • Response deadline pressure
  • Prosecution history implications

How Claude Helps

Claude analyzes office actions and assists with response preparation. It analyzes each rejection, develops response strategy, drafts arguments, suggests claim amendments, and prepares interview agendas.

Step-by-Step Workflow

1

Receive office action

Review the examiner's rejections and requirements

2

Analyze rejections

Claude breaks down each rejection type and basis

3

Develop strategy

Determine response approach for each rejection

4

Draft response

Generate arguments, amendments, and remarks

5

Consider interview

Prepare examiner interview agenda if appropriate

Example Prompt

Analyze this office action and prepare response:

OFFICE ACTION:
- Application: [Number]
- Claims: 1-20
- Rejections:
  * Claims 1-5: §102 anticipation (Reference A)
  * Claims 6-15: §103 obviousness (References A + B)
  * Claims 16-20: §112 indefiniteness

ANALYSIS:

1. §102 REJECTION ANALYSIS
- Reference A teachings
- Missing claim elements
- Date/priority issues
- Response arguments

2. §103 REJECTION ANALYSIS
- Combination rationale
- Teaching away arguments
- Secondary considerations
- Response strategy

3. §112 ANALYSIS
- Identified indefiniteness
- Specification support
- Amendment options

4. CLAIM AMENDMENT STRATEGY
- Independent claim amendments
- New dependent claims
- Claim cancellations

5. ARGUMENTS
- For each rejection type
- Supporting evidence
- Examiner interview points

6. RESPONSE DOCUMENT
- Remarks section
- Claim amendments
- Declaration needs

Generate response strategy and draft remarks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Claude predict examiner acceptance?

Claude suggests strong arguments. Examiner decisions vary.

What about final rejections?

Specify rejection type. Final OA responses require different strategy considerations.

How does Claude handle continuation decisions?

Include prosecution history for continuation vs. appeal analysis.

Learn This Skill

Related Use Cases