Contract-playbookbeoordelaar

Beoordeelt commerciële contracten tegen uw onderhandelings-playbook, markeert afwijkingen met ernst en stelt redlines voor leveranciers- en klantovereenkomsten voor.

Voorbeeld proberen Learn to build skills

Official alternative

Anthropic maintains an official plugin workflow for this task. Use it when you want the full marketplace plugin with MCP connectors.

Commercial Legal Plugin

/plugin install commercial-legal@claude-for-legal

Official outputs require attorney review before client reliance.

Over deze skill

Beoordeelt commerciële contracten tegen uw onderhandelings-playbook, markeert afwijkingen met ernst en stelt redlines voor leveranciers- en klantovereenkomsten voor.

Skills provide structured workflow guidance for attorney-supervised use. They are not legal advice and require human review before client reliance.

How to install

Download starter bundle

Download the ZIP and unzip the skill folder.
In Claude: Settings → Capabilities → Skills → Upload skill folder.
In Claude Code or Codex: copy the folder into `.claude/skills/` or `~/.agents/skills/`.
Invoke the skill by describing a task that matches the skill description.

Skills provide structured workflow guidance for attorney-supervised use. They are not legal advice and require human review before client reliance.

Voorbeeldworkflow preview

Use synthetic sample matter data to preview the prompt structure and review checklist before downloading or installing.

Sample data only. Do not upload client matter documents in this preview.

Sample SaaS vendor agreement excerpt

[SYNTHETIC SAMPLE — NOT A CLIENT DOCUMENT]

Section 8. Limitation of Liability
Except for breaches of confidentiality, neither party's aggregate liability shall exceed $10,000.

Section 9. Indemnification
Customer shall indemnify Vendor against all third-party claims arising from Customer's use of the Services.

Section 12. Termination
Vendor may terminate for convenience on 7 days notice.

Copy sample prompt

Review this commercial SaaS agreement excerpt against a standard customer-side playbook. Flag each clause as GREEN/YELLOW/RED, explain the business risk, and propose fallback language. Do not treat this as approval to sign.

Expected review checklist

Confirm liability cap aligns with deal size and playbook floor
Check whether indemnity is mutual and scope-limited
Verify termination-for-convenience notice period
Escalate RED items to supervising counsel before sharing externally

Skill content preview

# Contract Playbook Reviewer

You are a contract review assistant for a legal team. Analyze contracts against the user's negotiation playbook, identify deviations, classify severity, and generate actionable redline suggestions.

## When to use

- Vendor, customer, or partner agreements
- Playbook-driven clause review
- Pre-negotiation risk triage

## Required inputs

Ask for, if missing:

1. Contract text or file
2. Applicable playbook or standard positions
3. Party role (customer, vendor, licensor, etc.)
4. Jurisdiction or governing law (if known)

## Review workflow

1. **Extract key provisions** — term, payment, liability, indemnity, IP, termination, confidentiality, data protection, assignment, dispute resolution.
2. **Compare to playbook** — for each provision, classify as:
- GREEN: matches standard or acceptable fallback
- YELLOW: negotiable deviation; explain business risk
- RED: outside acceptable range; recommend escalation
3. **Draft redlines** — propose specific language for YELLOW/RED items only.
4. **Executive summary** — top 5 issues, recommended negotiation sequence, open questions.

## Output format

## Guardrails

- Do not present output as final legal advice.
- Flag assumptions when playbook positions are missing.
- Preserve defined terms and cross-references when suggesting redlines.
- Escalate uncapped liability, unilateral indemnities, and missing data protection terms.

## References

See `references/playbook-template.md` for a starter playbook structure.

Sources and official references

github.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal

Skills provide structured workflow guidance for attorney-supervised use. They are not legal advice and require human review before client reliance.