Αναθεώρηση συμβάσεων με playbook
Αναλύει εμπορικές συμβάσεις έναντι του playbook διαπραγμάτευσης, επισημαίνει αποκλίσεις και προτείνει redlines.
Official alternative
Anthropic maintains an official plugin workflow for this task. Use it when you want the full marketplace plugin with MCP connectors.
Commercial Legal Plugin/plugin install commercial-legal@claude-for-legal
Official outputs require attorney review before client reliance.
Σχετικά με αυτό το skill
Αναλύει εμπορικές συμβάσεις έναντι του playbook διαπραγμάτευσης, επισημαίνει αποκλίσεις και προτείνει redlines.
Skills provide structured workflow guidance for attorney-supervised use. They are not legal advice and require human review before client reliance.
Εγκατάσταση
- Download the ZIP and unzip the skill folder.
- In Claude: Settings → Capabilities → Skills → Upload skill folder.
- In Claude Code or Codex: copy the folder into `.claude/skills/` or `~/.agents/skills/`.
- Invoke the skill by describing a task that matches the skill description.
Skills provide structured workflow guidance for attorney-supervised use. They are not legal advice and require human review before client reliance.
Προεπισκόπηση δείγματος
Use synthetic sample matter data to preview the prompt structure and review checklist before downloading or installing.
Μόνο δεδομένα δείγματος. Μην ανεβάσετε έγγραφα πελάτη.
Sample SaaS vendor agreement excerpt
[SYNTHETIC SAMPLE — NOT A CLIENT DOCUMENT] Section 8. Limitation of Liability Except for breaches of confidentiality, neither party's aggregate liability shall exceed $10,000. Section 9. Indemnification Customer shall indemnify Vendor against all third-party claims arising from Customer's use of the Services. Section 12. Termination Vendor may terminate for convenience on 7 days notice.
Αντιγραφή prompt δείγματος
Review this commercial SaaS agreement excerpt against a standard customer-side playbook. Flag each clause as GREEN/YELLOW/RED, explain the business risk, and propose fallback language. Do not treat this as approval to sign.
Λίστα ελέγχου
- Confirm liability cap aligns with deal size and playbook floor
- Check whether indemnity is mutual and scope-limited
- Verify termination-for-convenience notice period
- Escalate RED items to supervising counsel before sharing externally
Προεπισκόπηση περιεχομένου
# Contract Playbook Reviewer You are a contract review assistant for a legal team. Analyze contracts against the user's negotiation playbook, identify deviations, classify severity, and generate actionable redline suggestions. ## When to use - Vendor, customer, or partner agreements - Playbook-driven clause review - Pre-negotiation risk triage ## Required inputs Ask for, if missing: 1. Contract text or file 2. Applicable playbook or standard positions 3. Party role (customer, vendor, licensor, etc.) 4. Jurisdiction or governing law (if known) ## Review workflow 1. **Extract key provisions** — term, payment, liability, indemnity, IP, termination, confidentiality, data protection, assignment, dispute resolution. 2. **Compare to playbook** — for each provision, classify as: - GREEN: matches standard or acceptable fallback - YELLOW: negotiable deviation; explain business risk - RED: outside acceptable range; recommend escalation 3. **Draft redlines** — propose specific language for YELLOW/RED items only. 4. **Executive summary** — top 5 issues, recommended negotiation sequence, open questions. ## Output format ```markdown ## Executive summary ## Provision table | Section | Playbook position | Contract language | Severity | Recommendation | ## Redline suggestions ## Open questions for business/client ## Attorney review checklist ``` ## Guardrails - Do not present output as final legal advice. - Flag assumptions when playbook positions are missing. - Preserve defined terms and cross-references when suggesting redlines. - Escalate uncapped liability, unilateral indemnities, and missing data protection terms. ## References See `references/playbook-template.md` for a starter playbook structure.
Πηγές και επίσημες αναφορές
Skills provide structured workflow guidance for attorney-supervised use. They are not legal advice and require human review before client reliance.